Topics available on this page:
- Vertical Cutting (minimum of intensity)
- Microburst Dangers
- Windshear during landing
- How to mitigate the danger
- Accidents and incidents
Windshear, wind shear, wind gradient, wind shear or wind shear, is a meteorological phenomenon that can be defined as a rapid variation of current in the wind, ie a rapid variation in direction and / or wind speed over a given distance.
The phenomenon can occur at all flight levels, however, it is particularly dangerous at low levels (from the ground up to approximately 2,000 feet in height), in the approach, landing and initial climb phases, due to the altitude limitation and time to maneuver of aircraft. At these times, the time for identification and retrieval is very short and sometimes in the order of a few seconds.
The wind shear can be mild, moderate, severe or extreme.
-Take - 0 to 4kt / 100ft
-Moderada - 5 to 8kt / 100ft
-Severa - 9 to 12kt / 100ft
-Extreme> 12kt / 100ft
Studies by aviation authorities around the world have identified a wide range of geographic conditions and weather phenomena associated with wind shear, such as thunderstorms, the presence of convective clouds (especially Cumulonimbus - CB), frontal systems, jet streams low levels, strong surface winds, sea and land breezes, topography, mountain waves, instability lines and marked temperature inversions, among others.
The Windshear Pilot Guide , made by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) presents a review of accidents and incidents reported worldwide between 1959 and 1983, which were identified in 51 meteorological events related to windshear .
Access the Windshear Pilot Guide
The events of windshear , subdivided by meteorological condition, are summarized below.
Convective formations (storms and rains) are good indications that there may be wind scissors.
Studies have shown that approximately 5% of the convective formations produce strong and concentrated downstream currents, called microbursts .
When the descending reaches the ground, it spreads horizontally and can form one or more horizontal vortex rings. The spreading region typically has diameters ranging from 1 to 2 miles and the vortices can reach up to 2,000 feet in height.
Effect measurements indicate that wind speed variations in microburst regions at their highest intensity are of the order of 45 knots. However, speed differences of almost 100 knots were detected in aviation accidents at US airports.
Due to the rapidity with which this phenomenon forms and falls apart, the passage through a microburst in the initial stage of its formation may not be significant for a pilot. However, the same situation, a few minutes later, can produce two or three times greater velocity variations. Downstream currents, at this stage, can force aircraft in landing or takeoff procedures to hit the ground or obstacles.
The entry of cold fronts can also cause windshear , albeit with lesser intensity.
Source: Adapted from AC 00-54
Source: Adapted from AC 00-54
Wind scissors can cause different effects on aircraft such as turbulence, increased or decreased speed indicated, sharp variations in the reasons for descent and / or ascent, altitude and bow.
The main result of all these effects is loss of lift.
Static ports (barometric altitude), pitot tube (velocity), and angle of attack sensor may display incorrect indications under windshea r condition .
Source: Adapted from AC 00-54
According to information from CENIPA, some accidents had a downward wind gust characteristic of windshear , which destabilized the aircraft during the approach to the landing and launched them against the ground.
If aircraft crash into the ground during landing, they may suffer substantial damage such as landing gear, wings, horizontal stabilizer, propellers, and engine.
The best way to avoid encountering a wind shear is to have prior knowledge of the meteorological information of the destination as well as to check if any significant weather phenomenon has occurred or is occurring locally.
Usually the crews are alerted on the trends favorable to this type of occurrence.
The most up-to-date information that can be obtained about the Windshear comes from other pilots who routinely report such occurrences to air traffic controllers, although there are equipment capable of measuring wind cutters at aerodromes, such as so-called wind profilers.
From these reports, the information is codified and disclosed as follows:
- Example of wind shear at head 10
METAR SBGL 131000Z 31015G27KT 280V350 4000 1800N R10 / P2000 + TSRA FEW005 FEW010CB SCT018 BKN025 10/03 Q0995 REDZ WS R10
- Another examples
SPECI SBGR 162030Z 36013KT 9999 TS VCSH SCT035 SCT050CB 25/19 Q1013 WS R09R
METAR SBGR 162100Z 27014G25KT 9999 VCTS BKN030 FEW050CB 23/20 Q1014 RETS WS R09R
METAR COR SBGR 162200Z 21005KT 9999 BKN025 BKN100 22/19 Q1015 WS R27L
- This information can also be disseminated through the Aerodrome Warning message
SBPA SBCT / SBBI / SBCA / SBPF / SBLJ AD WRNG 4 VALID 141520/141920 SFC WSPD 15KT MAX 25 FCST NC
If the aircraft is subjected to the effects of a wind shear, a countermeasure is to apply maximum power to the engine (s) and to execute a rush in the air.
The degree of risk represented by the phenomenon must be correctly evaluated and managed by the pilot, should he decide to continue the landing procedure under Windshear conditions . As a result of this factor, the performance in the aircraft commands must be efficient in order to avoid the violent impact of the aircraft against the ground.
The realization of a rush in the air and a new traffic circuit or the continuation of the flight to the alternative aerodrome would be the most appropriate lines of action under Windshear conditions .
If the pilot is surprised and can not make a rush, the recovery maneuver should focus on maintaining the aircraft's trajectory.
Access RBAC 135
Some aircraft have EGPWS ( Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System ), an equipment capable of alerting the crew when the aircraft is under the effects of a Windshear .
In the flight planning phase, the occurrence of wind shear at the departure aerodrome or at the destination aerodrome can be identified by consulting weather reports.
The phenomenon was mentioned in the investigation reports of the following accidents / incidents:
- A-073 / CENIPA / 2016
- A-120 / CENIPA / 2014
- A-606 / CENIPA / 2014
- A-071 / CENIPA / 2012
- A-039 / CENIPA / 2012
- B773, Dubai UAE, 2016
- A333, Montréal QC Canada, 2014
- AT75, vicinity Cork Ireland, 2014
- B732, vicinity Islamabad Pakistan, 2012
- A321, Manchester UK, 2011 (2)
- A319, vicinity Wuxi China, 2010
- B735, Denver USA, 2008
- B732, vicinity Abuja Nigeria, 2006
- AS50, en-route, Hawaii USA, 2005
- A321, Hakodate Japan, 2002
- AS32, en-route, North Sea UK, 2002
- B734, Brisbane Australia, 2001
- A320, Bilbao Spain, 2001
- USAir, Charlotte-Douglas Airport, NC, report AAR-95/03, 1994
- Delta Air Lines, Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, USA, report AAR-86/05, 1985
- Pan American World Airways, Kenner, Lousiana, USA, report AAR-83/02, 1982
- Air Winsconsin, Nebraska, USA, Report DCA80AA019, 1980
- Southern Airways, New Hope, Georgia, USA, DCA77AA015, 1977
- Allegheny Airlines, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, AAR-78-02 Report, 1976
- Iberia, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, report AAR-74-14, 1973
- Ozark Airlines, St. Lousi, Missouri, USA, AAR-74-05 Report, 1973
*As notas que contém itens de regulamentos brasileiros não foram traduzidas para que a interpretação delas não seja diferente da interpretação pretendida.
**Notes containing items of Brazilian regulations have not been translated so that their interpretation is not different from the intended interpretation.
Did you find errors in this content ? Send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to report.